public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
To: Anton A. Melnikov <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Don't process multi xmax in FreezeMultiXactId() if it is already marked as invalid.
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:21:25 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2024-Jun-14, Anton A. Melnikov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The src/backend/access/heap/README.tuplock says about HEAP_XMAX_INVALID bit
> that "Any tuple with this bit set does not have a valid value stored in XMAX."
>
> Found that FreezeMultiXactId() tries to process such an invalid multi xmax
> and may looks for an update xid in the pg_multixact for it.
>
> Maybe not do this work in FreezeMultiXactId() and exit immediately if the
> bit HEAP_XMAX_INVALID was already set?
>
> For instance, like that:
>
> master
> @@ -6215,6 +6215,15 @@ FreezeMultiXactId(MultiXactId multi, uint16 t_infomask,
> /* We should only be called in Multis */
> Assert(t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_IS_MULTI);
> + /* Xmax is already marked as invalid */
> + if (MultiXactIdIsValid(multi) &&
> + (t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_INVALID))
Hmm, but why are we calling FreezeMultiXactId at all if the
HEAP_XMAX_INVALID bit is set? We shouldn't do that. I think the fix
should appear in heap_prepare_freeze_tuple() to skip work completely if
HEAP_XMAX_INVALID is set. Then in FreezeMultiXactId you could simply
Assert() that the given tuple does not have HEAP_XMAX_INVALID set.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"It takes less than 2 seconds to get to 78% complete; that's a good sign.
A few seconds later it's at 90%, but it seems to have stuck there. Did
somebody make percentages logarithmic while I wasn't looking?"
http://smylers.hates-software.com/2005/09/08/1995c749.html
view thread (7+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Don't process multi xmax in FreezeMultiXactId() if it is already marked as invalid.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox