Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tI6OC-00C9Rq-Ic for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:23:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tI6O9-00HHli-Fa for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:22:58 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tI6O8-00HHla-Nl for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:22:58 +0000 Received: from fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.154]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tI6O6-000eaC-4t for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:22:57 +0000 Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.phl.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505E8114011B; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 08:22:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Dec 2024 08:22:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1733145772; x=1733232172; bh=Q KozhDQEOpUsj77U1swn4TyadlhWVXYefrfDs56EyDo=; b=4P/An61ESh+FAumbs byFkVmo3VUlzPg57Vg37LUtBwnUjwxrOJsbypWxIy9oONVvc33iYIrJWRGPJxoAF SDEmPkaq+JE7WTrm2faGpwU66V5HKyubMjnxCSPw4GALPe6ESARaAMuyk6g9afLx QLd1PLOA4B5vzPzuU86omfbuftdkWpToYIpwL0SWPQ7Ye+WdWeQ0DpK/k+i7x/xT bI0OH9ekzi9ewB9dipPSZKu1kxdqJ4u6s4Ik1uDssaYhuuqHOPqCQ33nJ2aIQXhy cMXomX/YAKkWt8zVvNmZB8orN5UkY+6DFMzKrJQpUvC028XSou/v99qCyVPOm17H YIyiw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrheelgdehtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvfevuf fkgggtugfgjgesthekredttddtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlvhgrrhhoucfjvghrrhgvrhgr uceorghlvhhhvghrrhgvsegrlhhvhhdrnhhoqdhiphdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepvdektdffudfftdffffehfffhjeejhffgieeuueekjeekfffgudffhfduffffueev necuffhomhgrihhnpegvnhhtvghrphhrihhsvggusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhvhhgvrhhrvgesrghlvhhh rdhnohdqihhprdhorhhgpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth dprhgtphhtthhopegsvghrthhrrghnuggurhhouhhvohhtrdhpghesghhmrghilhdrtgho mhdprhgtphhtthhopehpghhsqhhlqdhhrggtkhgvrhhssehlihhsthhsrdhpohhsthhgrh gvshhqlhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ia2694551:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 08:22:51 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alvh.no-ip.org; s=schmee; t=1733145769; bh=GVuvawxKlZkWdfaSab5ujBVumF6TrN/XzV39aXgTF4o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=MuEmIbS+ThVEIa3yUq12iqJ77Mq4oC8+G1DTMzN5fCl8tO9sXufoJP6PAi7GiTOx5 ERTzJDjXUy7qTjgI7/j+zi8u3KvfqY5j8g8A+F0tHWyHbzjRC4mYzSulB3+A5BqgYX VNNKWFgDuwfy+tn0Q252Sfc1zV6cyCOw0NiDsl4WrXIUHJsbfH/fmSUL7rMrUuc5ms AjBAiztUtRZbGKTvfND5l4cUwZss3Raecd3oTZQfu/ymX3W+w/AHPvQ4eMLZfdY5sm mmb1iHVKAm4CRDJ1/xKM2sKT3syc0fQt2MX2+UkYRy0Ugb6WLZe0jP2iAmPa0ZYzsB ybGRHFkA0zgXQ== Received: by schmee.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8E93C95; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:22:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:22:49 +0100 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Bertrand Drouvot Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Drop back the redundant "Lock" suffix from LWLock wait event names Message-ID: <202412021322.s6b2objq26mv@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 2024-Dec-02, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > Hi hackers, > > da952b415f unintentionally added back the "Lock" suffix into the LWLock wait > event names: > > - "added back" because the "Lock" suffix was removed in 14a9101091 > - "unintentionally" because there is nothing in the thread [2] that explicitly > mentions that the idea was also to revert 14a9101091 Oh, you're right, this was unintentional and unnoticed. I'll push this shortly, to both 17 and master. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/