Feedback-ID: ia2694551:Fastmail
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 09:44:30 +0100
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml@gmail.com>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>, 
	"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Maiquel Grassi <grassi@hotmail.com.br>, 
	"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>, 
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, 
	"Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, 
	Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru>, Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Subject: Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Message-ID: <202501130844.yu2rovbwkl2u@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAMWA6yYA96TsxZM3Z4Q4Z-COG215S7yCmdwwihu7CqvymUPXjA@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202501130844.yu2rovbwkl2u%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

On 2025-Jan-10, Hunaid Sohail wrote:

> IMO, we should continue with v35 and add all parameters from
> PQparameterStatus,
> as Sami suggested. The names themselves are informative enough.

IMO we need more opinions.  Maybe enough other people are not as unhappy
about the three-table solution.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/