Feedback-ID: ia2694551:Fastmail
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 20:28:36 +0100
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, 
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection
Message-ID: <202501141928.4il2k5oyaosu@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAAKRu_b0U_DDFSYP9JNo=GXbHyyGohDgvLj6wkYDsrZxtyg6VA@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202501141928.4il2k5oyaosu%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

On 2025-Jan-14, Melanie Plageman wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:21 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

> > 55432 18devel 560655=# select name, category from pg_settings where (short_desc ilike '%vacuum%' or extra_desc ilike '%vacuum%') and category not ilike '%vacuum%';
> >             name             │              category
> > ─────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────
> >  autovacuum_work_mem         │ Resource Usage / Memory
> >  log_autovacuum_min_duration │ Reporting and Logging / What to Log
> >  maintenance_work_mem        │ Resource Usage / Memory
> >  vacuum_buffer_usage_limit   │ Resource Usage / Memory
> 
> Yea, Alena also mentioned these GUCs that are in different groups. I
> think it is okay for these four to remain in their current locations
> as their current groupings seem descriptive enough.

I agree.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"No hay ausente sin culpa ni presente sin disculpa" (Prov. francés)