public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH 1/8] Pass all scan keys to BRIN consistent function at once 2+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH 1/8] Pass all scan keys to BRIN consistent function at once @ 2020-09-12 13:07 Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Tomas Vondra @ 2020-09-12 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw) Passing all scan keys to the BRIN consistent function at once may allow elimination of additional ranges, which would be impossible when only passing individual scan keys. The code continues to support both the original (one scan key at a time) and new (all scan keys at once) approaches, depending on whether the consistent function accepts three or four arguments. This modifies the existing BRIN opclasses (minmax, inclusion) although those don't really benefit from this change. The primary purpose of this is to allow more advanced opclases in the future. Author: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mark Dilger <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected] --- src/backend/access/brin/brin.c | 150 +++++++++++++++----- src/backend/access/brin/brin_inclusion.c | 170 +++++++++++++++-------- src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax.c | 121 +++++++++++----- src/backend/access/brin/brin_validate.c | 4 +- src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat | 4 +- 5 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/brin/brin.c b/src/backend/access/brin/brin.c index 27ba596c6e..dc187153aa 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/brin/brin.c +++ b/src/backend/access/brin/brin.c @@ -390,6 +390,9 @@ bringetbitmap(IndexScanDesc scan, TIDBitmap *tbm) BrinMemTuple *dtup; BrinTuple *btup = NULL; Size btupsz = 0; + ScanKey **keys; + int *nkeys; + int keyno; opaque = (BrinOpaque *) scan->opaque; bdesc = opaque->bo_bdesc; @@ -411,6 +414,61 @@ bringetbitmap(IndexScanDesc scan, TIDBitmap *tbm) */ consistentFn = palloc0(sizeof(FmgrInfo) * bdesc->bd_tupdesc->natts); + /* + * Make room for per-attribute lists of scan keys that we'll pass to the + * consistent support procedure. + */ + keys = palloc0(sizeof(ScanKey *) * bdesc->bd_tupdesc->natts); + nkeys = palloc0(sizeof(int) * bdesc->bd_tupdesc->natts); + + /* + * Preprocess the scan keys - split them into per-attribute arrays. + */ + for (keyno = 0; keyno < scan->numberOfKeys; keyno++) + { + ScanKey key = &scan->keyData[keyno]; + AttrNumber keyattno = key->sk_attno; + + /* + * The collation of the scan key must match the collation + * used in the index column (but only if the search is not + * IS NULL/ IS NOT NULL). Otherwise we shouldn't be using + * this index ... + */ + Assert((key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) || + (key->sk_collation == + TupleDescAttr(bdesc->bd_tupdesc, + keyattno - 1)->attcollation)); + + /* First time we see this index attribute, so init as needed. */ + if (!keys[keyattno-1]) + { + FmgrInfo *tmp; + + /* + * This is a bit of an overkill - we don't know how many + * scan keys are there for this attribute, so we simply + * allocate the largest number possible. This may waste + * a bit of memory, but we only expect small number of + * scan keys in general, so this should be negligible, + * and it's cheaper than having to repalloc repeatedly. + */ + keys[keyattno - 1] = palloc0(sizeof(ScanKey) * scan->numberOfKeys); + + /* First time this column, so look up consistent function */ + Assert(consistentFn[keyattno - 1].fn_oid == InvalidOid); + + tmp = index_getprocinfo(idxRel, keyattno, + BRIN_PROCNUM_CONSISTENT); + fmgr_info_copy(&consistentFn[keyattno - 1], tmp, + CurrentMemoryContext); + } + + /* Add key to the per-attribute array. */ + keys[keyattno - 1][nkeys[keyattno - 1]] = key; + nkeys[keyattno - 1]++; + } + /* allocate an initial in-memory tuple, out of the per-range memcxt */ dtup = brin_new_memtuple(bdesc); @@ -471,7 +529,7 @@ bringetbitmap(IndexScanDesc scan, TIDBitmap *tbm) } else { - int keyno; + int attno; /* * Compare scan keys with summary values stored for the range. @@ -481,51 +539,75 @@ bringetbitmap(IndexScanDesc scan, TIDBitmap *tbm) * no keys. */ addrange = true; - for (keyno = 0; keyno < scan->numberOfKeys; keyno++) + for (attno = 1; attno <= bdesc->bd_tupdesc->natts; attno++) { - ScanKey key = &scan->keyData[keyno]; - AttrNumber keyattno = key->sk_attno; - BrinValues *bval = &dtup->bt_columns[keyattno - 1]; + BrinValues *bval; Datum add; - /* - * The collation of the scan key must match the collation - * used in the index column (but only if the search is not - * IS NULL/ IS NOT NULL). Otherwise we shouldn't be using - * this index ... - */ - Assert((key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) || - (key->sk_collation == - TupleDescAttr(bdesc->bd_tupdesc, - keyattno - 1)->attcollation)); + /* skip attributes without any san keys */ + if (nkeys[attno - 1] == 0) + continue; - /* First time this column? look up consistent function */ - if (consistentFn[keyattno - 1].fn_oid == InvalidOid) - { - FmgrInfo *tmp; + bval = &dtup->bt_columns[attno - 1]; - tmp = index_getprocinfo(idxRel, keyattno, - BRIN_PROCNUM_CONSISTENT); - fmgr_info_copy(&consistentFn[keyattno - 1], tmp, - CurrentMemoryContext); - } + Assert((nkeys[attno - 1] > 0) && + (nkeys[attno - 1] <= scan->numberOfKeys)); /* * Check whether the scan key is consistent with the page * range values; if so, have the pages in the range added * to the output bitmap. * - * When there are multiple scan keys, failure to meet the - * criteria for a single one of them is enough to discard - * the range as a whole, so break out of the loop as soon - * as a false return value is obtained. + * The opclass may or may not support processing of multiple + * scan keys. We can determine that based on the number of + * arguments - functions with extra parameter (number of scan + * keys) do support this, otherwise we have to simply pass the + * scan keys one by one, */ - add = FunctionCall3Coll(&consistentFn[keyattno - 1], - key->sk_collation, - PointerGetDatum(bdesc), - PointerGetDatum(bval), - PointerGetDatum(key)); - addrange = DatumGetBool(add); + if (consistentFn[attno - 1].fn_nargs >= 4) + { + Oid collation; + + /* + * Collation from the first key (has to be the same for + * all keys for the same attribue). + */ + collation = keys[attno - 1][0]->sk_collation; + + /* Check all keys at once */ + add = FunctionCall4Coll(&consistentFn[attno - 1], + collation, + PointerGetDatum(bdesc), + PointerGetDatum(bval), + PointerGetDatum(keys[attno - 1]), + Int32GetDatum(nkeys[attno - 1])); + addrange = DatumGetBool(add); + } + else + { + /* + * Check keys one by one + * + * When there are multiple scan keys, failure to meet the + * criteria for a single one of them is enough to discard + * the range as a whole, so break out of the loop as soon + * as a false return value is obtained. + */ + int keyno; + + for (keyno = 0; keyno < nkeys[attno - 1]; keyno++) + { + add = FunctionCall3Coll(&consistentFn[attno - 1], + keys[attno - 1][keyno]->sk_collation, + PointerGetDatum(bdesc), + PointerGetDatum(bval), + PointerGetDatum(keys[attno - 1][keyno])); + addrange = DatumGetBool(add); + if (!addrange) + break; + } + } + if (!addrange) break; } diff --git a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_inclusion.c b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_inclusion.c index 12e5bddd1f..215bc794d3 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_inclusion.c +++ b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_inclusion.c @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static FmgrInfo *inclusion_get_procinfo(BrinDesc *bdesc, uint16 attno, uint16 procnum); static FmgrInfo *inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(BrinDesc *bdesc, uint16 attno, Oid subtype, uint16 strategynum); +static bool inclusion_consistent_key(BrinDesc *bdesc, BrinValues *column, + ScanKey key, Oid colloid); /* @@ -258,53 +260,109 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { BrinDesc *bdesc = (BrinDesc *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0); BrinValues *column = (BrinValues *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(1); - ScanKey key = (ScanKey) PG_GETARG_POINTER(2); - Oid colloid = PG_GET_COLLATION(), - subtype; - Datum unionval; - AttrNumber attno; - Datum query; - FmgrInfo *finfo; - Datum result; - - Assert(key->sk_attno == column->bv_attno); + ScanKey *keys = (ScanKey *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(2); + int nkeys = PG_GETARG_INT32(3); + Oid colloid = PG_GET_COLLATION(); + int keyno; + bool regular_keys = false; - /* Handle IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests. */ - if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) + /* + * First check if there are any IS NULL scan keys, and if we're + * violating them. In that case we can terminate early, without + * inspecting the ranges. + */ + for (keyno = 0; keyno < nkeys; keyno++) { - if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL) + ScanKey key = keys[keyno]; + + Assert(key->sk_attno == column->bv_attno); + + /* handle IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) { - if (column->bv_allnulls || column->bv_hasnulls) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); - } + if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL) + { + if (column->bv_allnulls || column->bv_hasnulls) + continue; /* this key is fine, continue */ - /* - * For IS NOT NULL, we can only skip ranges that are known to have - * only nulls. - */ - if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!column->bv_allnulls); + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + } - /* - * Neither IS NULL nor IS NOT NULL was used; assume all indexable - * operators are strict and return false. - */ - PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + /* + * For IS NOT NULL, we can only skip ranges that are known to have + * only nulls. + */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL) + { + if (column->bv_allnulls) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + + continue; + } + + /* + * Neither IS NULL nor IS NOT NULL was used; assume all indexable + * operators are strict and return false. + */ + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + } + else + /* note we have regular (non-NULL) scan keys */ + regular_keys = true; } - /* If it is all nulls, it cannot possibly be consistent. */ - if (column->bv_allnulls) + /* + * If the page range is all nulls, it cannot possibly be consistent if + * there are some regular scan keys. + */ + if (column->bv_allnulls && regular_keys) PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + /* If there are no regular keys, the page range is considered consistent. */ + if (!regular_keys) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + /* It has to be checked, if it contains elements that are not mergeable. */ if (DatumGetBool(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_UNMERGEABLE])) PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); - attno = key->sk_attno; - subtype = key->sk_subtype; - query = key->sk_argument; - unionval = column->bv_values[INCLUSION_UNION]; + /* Check that the range is consistent with all scan keys. */ + for (keyno = 0; keyno < nkeys; keyno++) + { + ScanKey key = keys[keyno]; + + /* ignore IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests handled above */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) + continue; + + /* + * When there are multiple scan keys, failure to meet the + * criteria for a single one of them is enough to discard + * the range as a whole, so break out of the loop as soon + * as a false return value is obtained. + */ + if (!inclusion_consistent_key(bdesc, column, key, colloid)) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + } + + PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); +} + +/* + * inclusion_consistent_key + * Determine if the range is consistent with a single scan key. + */ +static bool +inclusion_consistent_key(BrinDesc *bdesc, BrinValues *column, ScanKey key, + Oid colloid) +{ + FmgrInfo *finfo; + AttrNumber attno = key->sk_attno; + Oid subtype = key->sk_subtype; + Datum query = key->sk_argument; + Datum unionval = column->bv_values[INCLUSION_UNION]; + Datum result; + switch (key->sk_strategy) { /* @@ -324,49 +382,49 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTOverRightStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTOverLeftStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTRightStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTOverRightStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTLeftStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTRightStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTOverLeftStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTBelowStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTOverAboveStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTOverBelowStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTAboveStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTOverAboveStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTBelowStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); case RTAboveStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTOverBelowStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); /* * Overlap and contains strategies @@ -384,7 +442,7 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, key->sk_strategy); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_DATUM(result); + return DatumGetBool(result); /* * Contained by strategies @@ -404,9 +462,9 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) RTOverlapStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); if (DatumGetBool(result)) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + return true; - PG_RETURN_DATUM(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); + return DatumGetBool(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); /* * Adjacent strategy @@ -423,12 +481,12 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) RTOverlapStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); if (DatumGetBool(result)) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + return true; finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, - RTAdjacentStrategyNumber); + RTAdjacentStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_DATUM(result); + return DatumGetBool(result); /* * Basic comparison strategies @@ -458,9 +516,9 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) RTRightStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); if (!DatumGetBool(result)) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + return true; - PG_RETURN_DATUM(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); + return DatumGetBool(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); case RTSameStrategyNumber: case RTEqualStrategyNumber: @@ -468,30 +526,30 @@ brin_inclusion_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) RTContainsStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); if (DatumGetBool(result)) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + return true; - PG_RETURN_DATUM(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); + return DatumGetBool(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); case RTGreaterEqualStrategyNumber: finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTLeftStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); if (!DatumGetBool(result)) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + return true; - PG_RETURN_DATUM(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); + return DatumGetBool(column->bv_values[INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY]); case RTGreaterStrategyNumber: /* no need to check for empty elements */ finfo = inclusion_get_strategy_procinfo(bdesc, attno, subtype, RTLeftStrategyNumber); result = FunctionCall2Coll(finfo, colloid, unionval, query); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(result)); + return !DatumGetBool(result); default: /* shouldn't happen */ elog(ERROR, "invalid strategy number %d", key->sk_strategy); - PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + return false; } } diff --git a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax.c b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax.c index 2ffbd9bf0d..12878ff3a0 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax.c +++ b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax.c @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ typedef struct MinmaxOpaque static FmgrInfo *minmax_get_strategy_procinfo(BrinDesc *bdesc, uint16 attno, Oid subtype, uint16 strategynum); +static bool minmax_consistent_key(BrinDesc *bdesc, BrinValues *column, + ScanKey key, Oid colloid); Datum @@ -146,47 +148,104 @@ brin_minmax_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { BrinDesc *bdesc = (BrinDesc *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0); BrinValues *column = (BrinValues *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(1); - ScanKey key = (ScanKey) PG_GETARG_POINTER(2); - Oid colloid = PG_GET_COLLATION(), - subtype; - AttrNumber attno; - Datum value; - Datum matches; - FmgrInfo *finfo; - - Assert(key->sk_attno == column->bv_attno); + ScanKey *keys = (ScanKey *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(2); + int nkeys = PG_GETARG_INT32(3); + Oid colloid = PG_GET_COLLATION(); + int keyno; + bool regular_keys = false; - /* handle IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests */ - if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) + /* + * First check if there are any IS NULL scan keys, and if we're + * violating them. In that case we can terminate early, without + * inspecting the ranges. + */ + for (keyno = 0; keyno < nkeys; keyno++) { - if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL) + ScanKey key = keys[keyno]; + + Assert(key->sk_attno == column->bv_attno); + + /* handle IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) { - if (column->bv_allnulls || column->bv_hasnulls) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); + if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL) + { + if (column->bv_allnulls || column->bv_hasnulls) + continue; /* this key is fine, continue */ + + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + } + + /* + * For IS NOT NULL, we can only skip ranges that are known to have + * only nulls. + */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL) + { + if (column->bv_allnulls) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + + continue; + } + + /* + * Neither IS NULL nor IS NOT NULL was used; assume all indexable + * operators are strict and return false. + */ PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); } + else + /* note we have regular (non-NULL) scan keys */ + regular_keys = true; + } - /* - * For IS NOT NULL, we can only skip ranges that are known to have - * only nulls. - */ - if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(!column->bv_allnulls); + /* + * If the page range is all nulls, it cannot possibly be consistent if + * there are some regular scan keys. + */ + if (column->bv_allnulls && regular_keys) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + + /* If there are no regular keys, the page range is considered consistent. */ + if (!regular_keys) + PG_RETURN_BOOL(true); - /* - * Neither IS NULL nor IS NOT NULL was used; assume all indexable - * operators are strict and return false. + /* Check that the range is consistent with all scan keys. */ + for (keyno = 0; keyno < nkeys; keyno++) + { + ScanKey key = keys[keyno]; + + /* ignore IS NULL/IS NOT NULL tests handled above */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) + continue; + + /* + * When there are multiple scan keys, failure to meet the + * criteria for a single one of them is enough to discard + * the range as a whole, so break out of the loop as soon + * as a false return value is obtained. */ - PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + if (!minmax_consistent_key(bdesc, column, key, colloid)) + PG_RETURN_DATUM(false);; } - /* if the range is all empty, it cannot possibly be consistent */ - if (column->bv_allnulls) - PG_RETURN_BOOL(false); + PG_RETURN_DATUM(true); +} + +/* + * minmax_consistent_key + * Determine if the range is consistent with a single scan key. + */ +static bool +minmax_consistent_key(BrinDesc *bdesc, BrinValues *column, ScanKey key, + Oid colloid) +{ + FmgrInfo *finfo; + AttrNumber attno = key->sk_attno; + Oid subtype = key->sk_subtype; + Datum value = key->sk_argument; + Datum matches; - attno = key->sk_attno; - subtype = key->sk_subtype; - value = key->sk_argument; switch (key->sk_strategy) { case BTLessStrategyNumber: @@ -229,7 +288,7 @@ brin_minmax_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) break; } - PG_RETURN_DATUM(matches); + return DatumGetBool(matches); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_validate.c b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_validate.c index 6d4253c05e..11835d85cd 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_validate.c +++ b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_validate.c @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ brinvalidate(Oid opclassoid) break; case BRIN_PROCNUM_CONSISTENT: ok = check_amproc_signature(procform->amproc, BOOLOID, true, - 3, 3, INTERNALOID, INTERNALOID, - INTERNALOID); + 3, 4, INTERNALOID, INTERNALOID, + INTERNALOID, INT4OID); break; case BRIN_PROCNUM_UNION: ok = check_amproc_signature(procform->amproc, BOOLOID, true, diff --git a/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat index b5f52d4e4a..2ef11245a8 100644 --- a/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat +++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat @@ -8183,7 +8183,7 @@ prosrc => 'brin_minmax_add_value' }, { oid => '3385', descr => 'BRIN minmax support', proname => 'brin_minmax_consistent', prorettype => 'bool', - proargtypes => 'internal internal internal', + proargtypes => 'internal internal internal int4', prosrc => 'brin_minmax_consistent' }, { oid => '3386', descr => 'BRIN minmax support', proname => 'brin_minmax_union', prorettype => 'bool', @@ -8199,7 +8199,7 @@ prosrc => 'brin_inclusion_add_value' }, { oid => '4107', descr => 'BRIN inclusion support', proname => 'brin_inclusion_consistent', prorettype => 'bool', - proargtypes => 'internal internal internal', + proargtypes => 'internal internal internal int4', prosrc => 'brin_inclusion_consistent' }, { oid => '4108', descr => 'BRIN inclusion support', proname => 'brin_inclusion_union', prorettype => 'bool', -- 2.26.2 --------------FA974B75A0C3E9CA18CE7207 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=UTF-8; name="0002-Move-IS-NOT-NULL-handling-from-BRIN-support-20210122.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="0002-Move-IS-NOT-NULL-handling-from-BRIN-support-20210122.pa"; filename*1="tch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH} Move instrumentation structs @ 2026-01-13 11:38 Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Álvaro Herrera @ 2026-01-13 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rowley <[email protected]>; +Cc: Mario González Troncoso <[email protected]>; Chao Li <[email protected]>; pgsql-hackers; Jacob Brazeal <[email protected]>; John Naylor <[email protected]> On 2026-Jan-13, David Rowley wrote: > There's a bit of conflicting opinion going on here with the changes > made in 128897b101e0. > > "false when it's value for in-memory space" > > I think the differing opinions depend on what you fill in the missing > words with in the badly written English. If you read "value" as "the > value", then "it's" is correct. Whereas if you read it as "value is", > then "its" is correct. I assume you didn't read it the same way as > John did. Yeah, if the "is" had been there I wouldn't have made the change. I mean, this would have been correct: true when maxSpace is value for on-disk space, false when its value is for in-memory space I debated whether to add the "is" or change the "its" to "it's" and decided that the smaller change was better. But I agree that a bigger rewording may be a better solution. > + bool isMaxSpaceDisk; /* true when the maxSpace value tracking is > + * on-disk space, false means it's tracking > + * memory space */ Sounds about right, though I think we can shave some words off that. How about int64 maxSpace; /* maximum amount of space occupied among sort * of groups, either in-memory or on-disk */ bool isMaxSpaceDisk; /* true when maxSpace tracks on-disk space, false * means in-memory */ ? (CCed Jacob as author and John as committer of that change, in case they care to comment.) FWIW the original wording comes from d2d8a229bc58. Incidentally, I notice that tuplesort_updatemax() has this comment: /* * Note: it might seem we should provide both memory and disk usage for a * disk-based sort. However, the current code doesn't track memory space * accurately once we have begun to return tuples to the caller (since we * don't account for pfree's the caller is expected to do), so we cannot * rely on availMem in a disk sort. This does not seem worth the overhead * to fix. Is it worth creating an API for the memory context code to * tell us how much is actually used in sortcontext? */ ... and I think we already have the API that this comment hypothesizes about. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "La virtud es el justo medio entre dos defectos" (Aristóteles) ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-13 11:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-09-12 13:07 [PATCH 1/8] Pass all scan keys to BRIN consistent function at once Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> 2026-01-13 11:38 Re: [PATCH} Move instrumentation structs Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox