Feedback-ID: ie3de48e3:Fastmail
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2026 14:49:58 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: Alexandre Felipe <o.alexandre.felipe@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, 
	nagata@sraoss.co.jp
Subject: Re: Incremental View Maintenance, take 2
Message-ID: <202602211347.b7tr67j4c7dw@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAE8JnxPEF9j7RS1xBbTGCkCcqzz1XPifvBO36iD0Gp+NvzioEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202602211347.b7tr67j4c7dw%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

On 2026-Feb-13, Alexandre Felipe wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
> 
> I tried resending, multiple times. I tried the last change, the first
> message, the message with the last patches, and a few others.

Yeah, it's not really guaranteed to work -- I think it would especially
fail to work if the original message comes from a domain that's strict
about its DMARC configuration; though there may be other issues as well.

I think we need to rewrite that feature somehow.  For instance, maybe we
can send the message (or the thread) as an attachment in a new email,
rather than delivering the original as is.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/