pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
SECURITY LABEL ON PROPERTY GRAPH: supported?
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

Commits from this thread:
  2026-07-06 73dfe79fd6 33bfad0f3c  Remove apparent support for SECURITY LABEL ON PROPERTY GRAPH
* SECURITY LABEL ON PROPERTY GRAPH: supported?
@ 2026-07-04 22:12  Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: Noah Misch @ 2026-07-04 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>; Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>; pgsql-hackers

Commit 2f094e7 edited doc/src/sgml/ref/security_label.sgml to say this would
work, but:

  SECURITY LABEL ON PROPERTY GRAPH pgr IS 'unclassified';
  ERROR:  security labels are not supported for this type of object

Which matches your intent, the implementation or the documentation?

(I noticed this when a cursory audit of RELKIND_VIEW matches took me to
SecLabelSupportsObjectType().  Consider auditing for RELKIND_VIEW matches that
need edits for RELKIND_PROPGRAPH.)





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: SECURITY LABEL ON PROPERTY GRAPH: supported?
@ 2026-07-06 10:27  Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
  parent: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2026-07-06 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>; Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>; pgsql-hackers

On 05.07.26 00:12, Noah Misch wrote:
> Commit 2f094e7 edited doc/src/sgml/ref/security_label.sgml to say this would
> work, but:
> 
>    SECURITY LABEL ON PROPERTY GRAPH pgr IS 'unclassified';
>    ERROR:  security labels are not supported for this type of object
> 
> Which matches your intent, the implementation or the documentation?

It was not meant to be supported (because it's unclear what it should 
do; someone could fix that).  I suppose the documentation was changed 
because the syntax does work, but that's just because of the way that 
gram.y is factored.  We don't document similar 
working-but-ultimately-not-working syntax, so this was inconsistent. 
There were some similar leftovers in the psql tab completion.  I have 
committed a fix for this.







^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-06 10:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-04 22:12 SECURITY LABEL ON PROPERTY GRAPH: supported? Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
2026-07-06 10:27 ` Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox