Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kPyhL-00060p-V9 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 01:56:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kPyhK-0001zm-Sw for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 01:56:54 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kPyhK-0001zf-ME for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 01:56:54 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kPyhI-0005qr-KS for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 01:56:54 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0971unSs2040114; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:56:49 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Noah Misch cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, David Rowley Subject: Re: Recent failures on buildfarm member hornet In-reply-to: <20201007014507.GB1422897@rfd.leadboat.com> References: <1830491.1601944935@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20201007014507.GB1422897@rfd.leadboat.com> Comments: In-reply-to Noah Misch message dated "Tue, 06 Oct 2020 18:45:07 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2040112.1602035809.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 21:56:49 -0400 Message-ID: <2040113.1602035809@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Noah Misch writes: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 08:42:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> hornet has failed its last five runs with >> TRAP: FailedAssertion("variadicArgType !=3D InvalidOid", File: "pg_aggr= egate.c", Line: 216, PID: 34734498) > Building the tree with -O0 suppresses the problem. (xlc does not have -= O1.) OK, that's pretty unsurprising. > Building just aggregatecmds.c and pg_aggregate.c that way does not, so I > suppose the damage arose elsewhere. Now that *is* surprising. Could you poke a little further to determine which module is getting miscompiled? (gram.o seems like the next most likely bet.) regards, tom lane