From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
cc: Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
        pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()?
In-reply-to: <122E6623-E3B3-4945-9DF2-ADF86F7C63A7@yandex-team.ru>
References: <be0339cc-1ae1-4892-9445-8e6d8995a44d@eisentraut.org> <47AEACEE-E5CC-40E4-8611-01F3A465AF16@yandex-team.ru> <9e7b21e7-4c63-4299-87f4-780a0699a7d8@eisentraut.org> <130996.1718814994@sss.pgh.pa.us> <CAMT0RQSdKQra6QC4b+eAynpqZ0SYdHDfGBBE7hty33OD9jx7Jg@mail.gmail.com> <647660.1719003075@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3110108.1719939353@sss.pgh.pa.us> <122E6623-E3B3-4945-9DF2-ADF86F7C63A7@yandex-team.ru>
Comments: In-reply-to "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
	message dated "Sat, 02 Nov 2024 12:37:26 +0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2069995.1730557625.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 10:27:05 -0400
Message-ID: <2069996.1730557625@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2069996.1730557625%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

"Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> writes:
> This thread has associated CF entry which is marked as RwF [0]. But the =
change proved to be useful [1] in understanding what we can expect from ti=
me source.
> It was requested many times before [2,3]. Reading through this thread it=
 seems to me that my questions about application of the pg_test_timing som=
ehow switched focus from this patch. However, I'd appreciate if it was app=
lied. Nanoseconds seem important to me.
> Let me know if I can help in any way. Thanks!

Basically, I think the code is ready, but I was awaiting Hannu's
proposal on rewriting the documentation for pg_test_timing.
Do you want to have a go at that?

			regards, tom lane