From: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
To: legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>
cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down
In-reply-to: <1582751446111-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
References: <11172.1550780283@sss.pgh.pa.us> <23468.1551369774@localhost>
 <CAN_9JTy95UMjOVDSc-4MBrA6Fc1hX2vh=t2RMHp=yGyAV=-Xsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1897.1562680064@spoje.net>
 <CAN_9JTzC1K-Gc3p5GD=dQeJD8k_Z5996B0rEYjVGx+pXPq8JPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <13971.1562920911@spoje.net>
 <CAN_9JTzAsBwv5zr4SRVO35OtMWQBXSLcUuY65NQ0ZtFCTOrMMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <19857.1563374392@localhost> <20190904202339.GA13644@alvherre.pgsql>
 <7087.1567663858@localhost> <1582751446111-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
Comments: In-reply-to legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>
   message dated "Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:10:46 -0700."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <20714.1582793501.1@antos>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:51:41 +0100
Message-ID: <20715.1582793501@antos>
Precedence: bulk

legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Antonin Houska-2 wrote

> > Right now I recall two problems: 1) is the way I currently store
> > RelOptInfo for the grouped relations correct?, 2) how should we handle
> > types for which logical equality does not imply physical (byte-wise)
> > equality?
> > =

> > Fortunately it seems now that I'm not the only one who cares about 2),=
 so
> > this
> > problem might be resolved soon:
> > =

> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAH2-Wzn3Ee49Gmxb7V1VJ3-AC8fWn-F=
r8pfWQebHe8rYRxt5OQ%40mail.gmail.com
> > =

> > But 1) still remains.
> > =

> =

> Hello
> would "pgsql: Add equalimage B-Tree support functions." =

> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1j72NY-0002gi-2B@gemulon.postgres=
ql.org

Yes, it seems so. I'll adapt the patch soon, hopefully next week. Thanks f=
or
reminder.

-- =

Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com