Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lw2zR-0007A6-Uw for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:32:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lw2zQ-0003s3-Sf for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:32:24 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lw2zQ-0003ru-LF for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:32:24 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lw2zN-0008Dp-FK for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:32:23 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 15NDWJ7H2080665; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:32:19 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Dunstan cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Reducing the cycle time for CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS buildfarm members In-reply-to: <3f3f3d9d-fccf-318d-5c16-622778b42645@dunslane.net> References: <1582507.1624227029@sss.pgh.pa.us> <467e9f1a-f440-4875-2677-36f52f556f62@dunslane.net> <1799344.1624396289@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3f3f3d9d-fccf-318d-5c16-622778b42645@dunslane.net> Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan message dated "Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:21:02 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2080663.1624455139.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:32:19 -0400 Message-ID: <2080664.1624455139@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andrew Dunstan writes: > Looks OK for the buildfarm patch. I wonder if we just want to run initdb > once with --clobber-cache instead of once per locale? I thought about that, but I'm not sure it's appropriate for the buildfarm client to be making that decision. I do not think any of the CCA animals run more than one locale anyway, so it's likely moot. regards, tom lane