Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1baSx8-0006fd-2v for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:26:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1baSx7-0000uo-83 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:26:09 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1baSx6-0000uh-7g for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:26:08 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1baSx3-0001ei-Gl for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:26:07 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u7IJPvQF020966; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:25:57 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner cc: Christian Convey , Yury Zhuravlev , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2 In-reply-to: <57B60792.3000307@kaltenbrunner.cc> References: <4184974.kkvGJ5GoEX@dinodell> <1974943.sWDBYWy5U3@dinodell> <56096E15.3040602@gmx.net> <2319e612-6c78-4fd4-8ccb-e1fa1bc84c01@postgrespro.ru> <57B60263.4020501@kaltenbrunner.cc> <57B60792.3000307@kaltenbrunner.cc> Comments: In-reply-to Stefan Kaltenbrunner message dated "Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:08:02 +0200" Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:25:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20965.1471548357@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes: > On 08/18/2016 08:57 PM, Christian Convey wrote: >> Which version of CMake gave you those errors? (Sorry if you provided >> that detail and I'm just missing it.) > % cmake --version > cmake version 2.8.10.2 > a quick look in the docs does not seem to reveal any kind of "minimum" > cmake version required - and the above is what is packaged as part of > openbsd 5.3 (which is outdated and unsupported upstream but it is > currently perfectly fine building all postgresql versions including > -HEAD and serving as a buildfarm member for years) As an additional comment, I don't see us accepting a build system that doesn't run on pretty old cmakes. We have never had a policy of "latest and greatest is required" for *any* build support tool, and cmake isn't likely to be given an exception. BTW, I just noticed that cmake doesn't seem to be supplied as part of Apple's dev tools, at least not up to current (El Capitan) releases. That's going to be a rather large minus to be taken into account whenever we make the go/no-go decision on this. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers