Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oMBpz-0000c5-Gh for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:19:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oMBpy-0000LG-ER for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:19:14 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oMBpy-0000HE-50 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:19:14 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oMBpw-0006LK-3A for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:19:13 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 27BHJ8o2021174; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:19:08 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Thomas Munro , Andrew Dunstan , Robert Haas , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage In-reply-to: <20220811171412.7sgz2mpro5fpko3t@awork3.anarazel.de> References: <20220804034343.unm4rdynedbigamv@awork3.anarazel.de> <3322724.1659586159@sss.pgh.pa.us> <295419.1659918447@sss.pgh.pa.us> <747620.1660002360@sss.pgh.pa.us> <488234.1660229571@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20220811171412.7sgz2mpro5fpko3t@awork3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Thu, 11 Aug 2022 10:14:12 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <21172.1660238348.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:19:08 -0400 Message-ID: <21173.1660238348@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund writes: > On 2022-08-11 10:52:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> -- I won't be too surprised if we get pushback on that after 15.0 is out. > From what angle? If I knew that, it'd be because we'd already received the pushback. I'm just suspicious that very little beta testing happens on Windows, and what does is probably mostly people running up-to-date Windows. So I think there's plenty of chance for "hey, this no longer works" complaints later. Maybe we'll be able to reject it all with "sorry, we desupported that version of Windows", but I dunno. regards, tom lane