Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ci5uz-0004kZ-BI for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 20:59:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ci5uy-0005ml-4W for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 20:59:44 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ci5uw-0005lc-Ry for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 20:59:42 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ci5uu-0008Vv-Lm for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 20:59:42 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1QKxOWV021445; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:59:24 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Michael Banck , Robert Haas , Alvaro Herrera , Jim Nasby , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint In-reply-to: References: <20170214210651.ldwzk6frxxclbomw@alvherre.pgsql> <1488137223.24065.7.camel@credativ.de> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:32:30 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <21443.1488142764.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:59:24 -0500 Message-ID: <21444.1488142764@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Magnus Hagander writes: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Michael Banck > wrote: >> ISTM the consensus is that there should be no output in regular mode, >> but a message should be displayed in verbose and progress mode. > Agreed, and applied as one patch. Is there an argument for back-patching this? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers