Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m886Q-0002YC-1V for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:25:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m886N-0004gw-NH for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:25:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m886N-0004fW-FN for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:25:31 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m886L-0004cD-9h for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:25:30 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 16QLPRko217472; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:25:27 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: automatically generating node support functions In-reply-to: <2f876203-7142-fa71-6d22-6ce00eb26869@enterprisedb.com> References: <2f876203-7142-fa71-6d22-6ce00eb26869@enterprisedb.com> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Mon, 19 Jul 2021 08:59:18 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <217470.1627334727.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:25:27 -0400 Message-ID: <217471.1627334727@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Peter Eisentraut writes: >> The first eight patches are to clean up various inconsistencies to make >> parsing or generation easier. > Are there any concerns about the patches 0001 through 0008? Otherwise, > maybe we could get those out of the way. I looked through those and don't have any complaints (though I just eyeballed them, I didn't see what a compiler would say). I see you pushed a couple of them already. regards, tom lane