From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
 YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>,
 Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
In-reply-to: <20150829213631.GI2912@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <4184974.kkvGJ5GoEX@dinodell>
 <CAFNqd5V-LWwWCfa_o1nxJB=jDMQTrAp51Z9c-dhBLsLjCFvb+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <2844430.7oqKMGMpEj@dinodell> <20150829205326.GH2912@alvherre.pgsql>
 <20150829210243.GI31526@awork2.anarazel.de> <22768.1440882857@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20150829213631.GI2912@alvherre.pgsql>
Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
 message dated "Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:36:32 -0300"
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 11:32:08 -0400
Message-ID: <21842.1440948728@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I imagine that esoteric platforms are not going to have cmake at all and
> are going to need their own installation anyway.  Not sure if that's
> going to be more onerous than the requirement to install GNU make.

If we get to the point where this is starting to look like a real
proposal, I'll try to install cmake from source on my buildfarm critters,
none of which have it ATM.  And we'll need to get other buildfarm owners
to do likewise.  So we'll be able to acquire data points on whether that's
a big problem or not.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers