Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1ikDXW-00085a-KC
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 20:45:54 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1ikDXV-0000JD-71
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 20:45:53 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1ikDXU-0000J5-To
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 20:45:52 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1ikDXS-0006O3-Ok
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 20:45:52 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xBPKjlKD002193;
	Wed, 25 Dec 2019 15:45:47 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys
In-reply-to: 
 <CA+HiwqEStonNz+1eHy68MfHQMmEmdX79TYR0=A2t=pG4D9LUdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+HiwqFUzjfj9HEsJtYWcr1SgQ_=iCAvQ=O2Sx6aQxoDu4OiHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5361.1576602769@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+HiwqGiGBgFFcL6YGKRqfX1-gYKmuLLG_JwU_UaSaX2J+jehQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <28160.1576676326@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+HiwqENLY2ta0goA0jcfk4cWdj2W0r6Ywjf=PQiMpJkyXygmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <26766.1576947735@sss.pgh.pa.us> <24653.1576962784@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+HiwqGug69_zhRCzENJPg_Ynpx_Eb-2-=N1u2Zw3X6T1S3wbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+HiwqEStonNz+1eHy68MfHQMmEmdX79TYR0=A2t=pG4D9LUdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
	message dated "Tue, 24 Dec 2019 18:08:48 +0900"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2191.1577306747.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 15:45:47 -0500
Message-ID: <2192.1577306747@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Precedence: bulk

Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 6:13 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I wonder whether we couldn't also lift
>>> the restriction against whole-row Vars in partition expressions.
>>> Doesn't seem like there is much difference between such a Var and
>>> a row(...)::table_rowtype expression.

> I gave that a try and ended up with attached that applies on top of
> your delay-loading-relcache-partition-data-2.patch.

Pushed with minor fixes.

			regards, tom lane