From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
        PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order
 (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
In-reply-to: 
 <CAH2-WzkMmRkXsWaVZ+VEbKdcKRcTuxu5ogVVH1SARqVuTuQKHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAH2-WzmYbkT6e9B1jWApV5HcApUZqC==yoC4VTi7TBs007Ki+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181218212053.4vqcmmcicbzr2jyc@alvherre.pgsql>
 <CAH2-WzkMmRkXsWaVZ+VEbKdcKRcTuxu5ogVVH1SARqVuTuQKHA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
	message dated "Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:02:37 -0800"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <21924.1545171102.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:11:42 -0500
Message-ID: <21925.1545171102@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 1:20 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com=
> wrote:
>> I can reproduce the
>> reported problem without your patch by using that flag.  Here's a
>> recipe:

> Interesting.
> Note that if the standard that we're going to hold a solution to here
> is "must produce sane output with  --ignore-system-indexes", then my
> solution will not meet that standard.

Do you mean "same" output, or "sane" output?  I'd certainly expect
the latter.

I think though that Alvaro was just offering this as a way to poke
at the posited bug in dependency.c without having to install your
whole patch.

			regards, tom lane