public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Jeff Davis <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Corey Huinker <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: jian he <[email protected]>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <[email protected]>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Frost <[email protected]>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:44:20 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <blezfpeafycxlizyynwvwzh2vywmklhvfqudhicjrccu4raqpx@4ttfufowc2vo>
<[email protected]>
<CADkLM=f0a43aTd88xW4xCFayEF25g-7hTrHX_WhV40HyocsUGg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CADkLM=ckXu5wzSQZ3Y_fvAaL8rZ+upZdSecBLf5FCTMj7M6T-A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CADkLM=dRMC6t8gp9GVf6y6E_r5EChQjMAAh_vPyih_zMiq0zvA@mail.gmail.com>
<y2d36zf6pl3n6ni6e4ctblu3a5iazi2dycknq53h2mjvp7lto4@hhww3h2qgdrw>
<[email protected]>
<CADkLM=eWSv2z_DVB=psfwHitq7DbFJQaP9A46R27eARC-4OYtQ@mail.gmail.com>
<cpdanvzykcb5o64rmapkx6n5gjypoce3y52hff7ocxupgpbxu4@53jmlyvukijo>
<CA+Tgmoaiyv5hA_LrdDyU-=Fu28R3ZhE=mSRfxj7x0ajDBM0Njg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+TgmoZwaLN9FzvMBW-2Yg_6PeenDhEg-8BRYX+yj8pSPcQ1aQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
Jeff Davis <[email protected]> writes:
> That would be a separate thread, but it's good to know that there is a
> general consensus that we don't want to use in-place updates for non-
> critical things like stats (and perhaps eliminate them entirely). In
> other words, the inconcistency likely won't last forever.
I'm quite sure that the original argument for using in-place updates
for this was not wanting a full-database VACUUM or ANALYZE to update
every tuple in pg_class. At the time that definitely did lead to
more-or-less 2x bloat. The new information we have now is that that's
no longer the case, and thus the decision can and should be revisited.
regards, tom lane
view thread (170+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox