Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ngSKm-0007XF-8n for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:26:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ngSKk-00035k-Sg for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:26:30 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ngSKk-00032f-J4 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:26:30 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ngSKe-0003QV-52 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:26:30 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 23IEQF9N2269984; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:26:15 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Michael Paquier , Andrew Dunstan , Erik Rijkers , Noah Misch , Robert Haas , Alvaro Herrera , Mark Dilger , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Postgres perl module namespace In-reply-to: <20220418141530.nfxtkohefvwnzncl@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <20210904061949.GA2326091@rfd.leadboat.com> <780f82bb-3a25-0c6f-154a-9f24b9324dba@dunslane.net> <615a96e7-6f8c-7bfb-216c-3ed0d619c04a@dunslane.net> <2bb5f5b2-5210-5c98-2be6-405283d6f817@xs4all.nl> <072a3088-7988-1c49-4d30-df47cf8e6415@dunslane.net> <20220418141530.nfxtkohefvwnzncl@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:15:30 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2269982.1650291975.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:26:15 -0400 Message-ID: <2269983.1650291975@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund writes: > I just, again, tried to backport a test as part of a bugfix. The > renaming between 14 and 15 makes that task almost comically harder. The > only way I see of dealing with that for the next 5 years is to just > never backpatch tests to < 15. Which seems like a bad outcome. Yeah ... > Except that it's *way* too late I would argue that this should just > straight up be reverted until that aspect is addressed. It's a > maintenance nightmare. I'm not for that, but could it be sane to back-patch the renaming? regards, tom lane