From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>,
 Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
In-reply-to: <20150829210243.GI31526@awork2.anarazel.de>
References: <4184974.kkvGJ5GoEX@dinodell>
 <CAFNqd5V-LWwWCfa_o1nxJB=jDMQTrAp51Z9c-dhBLsLjCFvb+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <2844430.7oqKMGMpEj@dinodell> <20150829205326.GH2912@alvherre.pgsql>
 <20150829210243.GI31526@awork2.anarazel.de>
Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
 message dated "Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:02:43 +0200"
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 17:14:17 -0400
Message-ID: <22768.1440882857@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2015-08-29 17:53:26 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Therefore, either we will not find any portability problems, or fixing
>> upstream those we do find will not be terribly difficult.

> Well, the difference to know is that we can't resolve that relatively
> quickly ourselves, but that it'd rather require $whoever installing a
> new version of cmake...

Yup.  So one of the things we'd want to establish is what's the minimum
version of cmake we're going to require, and which (hopefully old)
platforms will we be leaving out in the cold with that?

I suspect it's premature to try to decide that now, but it's certainly
a question to keep in mind.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers