Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkF1X-0000FX-4D for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:16:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkF1V-0006w1-R8 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:16:25 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkF1V-0006vt-Gd for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:16:25 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkF1T-0000p8-54 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:16:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0HLGLpR022803; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:16:21 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD In-reply-to: References: <9427.1547701450@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to =?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= message dated "Thu, 17 Jan 2019 22:12:57 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <22801.1547759781.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:16:21 -0500 Message-ID: <22802.1547759781@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk =?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= writes: > On 2019-01-17 06:04, Tom Lane wrote: >> Although we've got a few NetBSD and OpenBSD buildfarm critters, >> none of them are doing --enable-tap-tests. If they were, we'd >> have noticed the pgbench regression tests falling over: > For what it's worth I've enabled tap-tests for my OpenBSD 5.9 (curculio) > and NetBSD 7 (sidewinder) animals now. Oh, thanks! I'm guessing they'll fail their next runs, but I'll wait to see confirmation of that before I do anything about the test bug. regards, tom lane