From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
        Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
        Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>,
        Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>, Jordan Gigov <coladict@gmail.com>,
        Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
In-reply-to: <1501757075.16140.9.camel@credativ.de>
References: <8f64786e-824d-7c0d-33a6-3d9e1c8e9fde@2ndquadrant.com>
 <edc1dc0d-66ba-0d9e-b0e7-890f064789d7@BlueTreble.com>
 <33b25c65-94f1-6ff6-c717-61a56294a255@2ndquadrant.com>
 <a537995b-ccdb-f668-5f67-98e9b9b4a99d@BlueTreble.com>
 <75409fb1-bd96-25c2-f6b0-c24e28ed2684@2ndquadrant.com>
 <65049c27-96bf-317b-b435-931f6041f94c@BlueTreble.com>
 <67d35333-ef65-074a-b2be-52440f245e43@2ndquadrant.com>
 <753dcafc-a648-9041-e9ca-e405cd4498f4@2ndquadrant.com>
 <20170306083342.GA8374@nighthawk.caipicrew.dd-dns.de>
 <2605f6d0-8444-528e-4e38-6b13968cfeb7@2ndquadrant.com>
 <20170306140101.GQ9812@tamriel.snowman.net> <28572.1500912583@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <18658.1501037135@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoYiUTPQGCjHYJ6DeiR1Qf-74XFO2Rp2WZnA88FdorZg6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <22969.1501075830@sss.pgh.pa.us> <19472.1501094484@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoZZXEHpz_pKOSfArkWpU6WDd55NoV8=1-sNiZxY1kqMzQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <27042.1501185133@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1501757075.16140.9.camel@credativ.de>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
	message dated "Thu, 03 Aug 2017 12:44:35 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <23584.1501796261.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 17:37:41 -0400
Message-ID: <23585.1501796261@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de> writes:
> Am Donnerstag, den 27.07.2017, 15:52 -0400 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> So I'm thinking we should consider the multi-pass patch I posted as
>> a short-term, backpatchable workaround, which we could hope to
>> replace with dependency logic later.

> +1, it would be really nice if this could be fixed in the back-branches 
> before v11.

Done.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers