Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciNA2-00037o-Bm for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:24:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciNA1-0002dg-Uk for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:24:25 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciN8W-0007Cm-M5 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:22:52 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciN8U-0004i9-HC for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:22:51 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1RFMhjP023989; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:22:43 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Michael Banck , Robert Haas , Alvaro Herrera , Jim Nasby , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint In-reply-to: References: <20170214210651.ldwzk6frxxclbomw@alvherre.pgsql> <1488137223.24065.7.camel@credativ.de> <21444.1488142764@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:20:47 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <23987.1488208963.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:22:43 -0500 Message-ID: <23988.1488208963@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Magnus Hagander writes: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Is there an argument for back-patching this? > I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take your > comment as a vote that we should back-patch it? Yeah, I'd vote for it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers