Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1noyoI-0007Ry-WD for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 02:44:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1noyoH-0005Bv-Sb for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 02:44:13 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1noyoH-0005Ba-JE for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 02:44:13 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1noyoB-0000CW-AM for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 02:44:12 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 24C2i5KZ240259; Wed, 11 May 2022 22:44:05 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: Ian Lawrence Barwick , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Wed, 11 May 2022 22:01:35 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <240257.1652323445.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 22:44:05 -0400 Message-ID: <240258.1652323445@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Bruce Momjian writes: > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:37:56AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: >>>> Remove exclusive backup mode (David Steele, Nathan Bossart) >> It'd be useful to mention exclusive backup mode has been deprecated sin= ce 9.6, >> lest the impression arise that an important-sounding feature has been t= orn out >> suddenly. > Well, the documentation was clear about it being deprecated, so I don't > see a need to mention it in the release notes. Yeah, but somebody reading these notes doesn't necessarily have that old documentation at hand. I think writing "Remove the long-deprecated exclusive backup mode" would do nicely to make this point without many extra words. regards, tom lane