Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cfWYO-0000uC-OT for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 18:49:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cfWYN-0005Nv-BV for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 18:49:47 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cfWWw-0003nC-Gw for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 18:48:18 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cfWWs-0006oC-LK for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 18:48:18 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1JImB0J024335; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 13:48:11 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: drop support for Python 2.3 In-reply-to: <1487527748.2748.37.camel@gunduz.org> References: <7d5073f6-d9ea-ab09-4805-69a12f23e52f@2ndquadrant.com> <9516.1486529343@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1486568115.5462.50.camel@gunduz.org> <0e2fd256-0a3a-bae8-4ef2-c536139c64cb@2ndquadrant.com> <1487493740.2748.13.camel@gunduz.org> <797.1487517822@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1453.1487518921@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1487527748.2748.37.camel@gunduz.org> Comments: In-reply-to Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= message dated "Sun, 19 Feb 2017 21:09:08 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24333.1487530091.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 13:48:11 -0500 Message-ID: <24334.1487530091@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= writes: > On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 10:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Relevant question: what version of tcl is installed on those? > 8.4.13 is installed. Hmph. I can't see any relevant-looking source changes between 8.4.13 and 8.4.15, which I have laying about here and which works fine. I wonder if Red Hat is carrying some distro-specific patch that breaks this case? Or conceivably it's timezone dependent? Anyway, my inclination is just to tweak that test a bit so it doesn't trip over the problem. The point of the test is mainly to see if the [clock] command works at all, not to exercise any specific parameter choices. Would you check whether this: $ tclsh % clock format [clock scan "1/26/2010"] -format "%U" gives the expected result "04" on that machine? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers