Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZm7x-0005MG-4T for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:19:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZm7v-0005Mv-Nv for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:19:15 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZm7v-0005Mj-E6 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:19:15 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eZm7t-0000pW-0l for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:19:14 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w0BNJ8Zc024411; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:19:08 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Stephen Frost cc: Robert Haas , Amit Kapila , Ildar Musin , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: IndexTupleDSize macro seems redundant In-reply-to: <20180111203250.GR2416@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <0274288e-9e88-13b6-c61c-7b36928bf221@postgrespro.ru> <20180111172241.GK2416@tamriel.snowman.net> <8984.1515692863@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20180111181713.GN2416@tamriel.snowman.net> <20180111203250.GR2416@tamriel.snowman.net> Comments: In-reply-to Stephen Frost message dated "Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:32:50 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24409.1515712748.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:19:08 -0500 Message-ID: <24410.1515712748@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Stephen Frost writes: > Updated (combined) patch attached for review. I went through and looked > again to make sure there weren't any cases of making an unaligned > pointer to a struct and didn't see any, and I added some comments to > _bt_restore_page(). Looks OK from here. regards, tom lane