From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
        PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order
 (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
In-reply-to: 
 <CAH2-WznqNNpoJ3srVTQpLmferGA1FuYmNeibn4Xq=bTU7XKZKA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20190205212829.GA20127@alvherre.pgsql>
 <4572.1549404528@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAH2-WzmRtQLJdC7KSdtwxQ65Yk+_Vi89eVqKJvPOx=Xc7WLLKw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20444.1549423295@sss.pgh.pa.us> <26049.1549516498@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAH2-WznqNNpoJ3srVTQpLmferGA1FuYmNeibn4Xq=bTU7XKZKA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
	message dated "Thu, 07 Feb 2019 18:53:34 -0800"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <24519.1549596934.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 22:35:34 -0500
Message-ID: <24520.1549596934@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:15 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I have a mostly-working patch along these lines that I hope to
>> finish up and post tomorrow.

> Do you think that you'll end up pushing the HEAD-only fix shortly?

I have a working patch now, but I think I'm too tired to explain it,
so I'm going to post it tomorrow instead.  It's a big enough change
that it might be advisable for someone to review it --- are you
interested?

			regards, tom lane