Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u157G-00Dk1o-5h for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:07:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u157E-00ELQJ-PY for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:07:24 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u157E-00ELQB-FL for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:07:24 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1u157C-003YqA-0a for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:07:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 535F7DLM2461392; Sat, 5 Apr 2025 11:07:14 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Noah Misch , Nathan Bossart , Andres Freund , Robert Pang , Kyotaro Horiguchi , robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Back-patch of: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash In-reply-to: References: <7chjz7zeigbsbt7nim4cj6zryflzcpy2lgenas3yh7cpvwf3gb@m6cwqzlvfd6q> <20250306193013.36.nmisch@google.com> <20250311205749.a8.nmisch@google.com> <20250312012315.fd.nmisch@google.com> <20250403002900.5d.nmisch@google.com> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Sat, 05 Apr 2025 19:14:27 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2461390.1743865633.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 11:07:13 -0400 Message-ID: <2461391.1743865633@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 05:29:00PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: >> Here it is. Making it fail three times took looping 1383s, 5841s, and = 2594s. >> Hence, it couldn't be expected to catch the regression before commit, b= ut it >> would have made sufficient buildfarm and CI noise in the day after comm= it. > Hmm. Not much of a fan of the addition of a test that has less than > 1% of reproducibility for the problem, even if it's good to see that > this can be made portable to run down to v13. Yeah, it's good to have a test but I doubt we should commit it. Too many buildfarm cycles will be expended for too little result. regards, tom lane