Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEGc2-0008Nv-85 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:34:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEGc1-0003VJ-3N for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:34:29 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEGc0-0003UM-O2 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:34:28 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iEGbu-0004fk-M8 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:34:27 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x8SHYJuo024793; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:34:19 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Amit Langote cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Instability of partition_prune regression test results In-reply-to: References: <11952.1569536725@sss.pgh.pa.us> <11381.1569599943@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Amit Langote message dated "Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:20:08 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24791.1569692059.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:34:19 -0400 Message-ID: <24792.1569692059@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Amit Langote writes: > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:59 AM Tom Lane wrote: >> Amit Langote writes: >>> Isn't the point of using ANALYZE here to show that the exec-param >>> based run-time pruning is working (those "never executed" strings)? >> Hm. Well, if you want to see those, we could do it as attached. > Perfect, thanks. OK, pushed that way. regards, tom lane