Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uhvYy-005b4h-Gm for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2025 19:37:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uhvYw-0098kd-Gy for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2025 19:37:06 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uhvYw-0098kV-7i for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2025 19:37:06 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uhvYt-000Ewb-12 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2025 19:37:05 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 571Jb2ww2492581; Fri, 1 Aug 2025 15:37:02 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alexander Borisov cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Improve the performance of Unicode Normalization Forms. In-reply-to: <9db10eba-a756-4b3f-9550-83cab1a1a39e@gmail.com> References: <844d3dd7-2955-4794-95d1-7f4c13cb89fc@gmail.com> <4211ffd7fe154c4af693b98d78f4a3689ce8cc30.camel@j-davis.com> <16f87504-f174-450e-93cc-2db1074522bb@gmail.com> <96c54fc3dde2ebaccafbd1ffa29b8be1005c8b8c.camel@j-davis.com> <677cde50-6d64-474b-9ba8-bab380a111b3@gmail.com> <599663a8d5948243bd87bf55a4f76bbb4a51a6e8.camel@j-davis.com> <85f2a36f-f70a-4667-be48-49b652457295@gmail.com> <088432f3-a3a9-4c40-8295-6c687c25d651@gmail.com> <9db10eba-a756-4b3f-9550-83cab1a1a39e@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Alexander Borisov message dated "Fri, 01 Aug 2025 22:00:08 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2492579.1754077022.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 15:37:02 -0400 Message-ID: <2492580.1754077022@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Alexander Borisov writes: > I'm new here, so please advise me: if a patch wasn't accepted at the > commitfest, does that mean it's not needed (no one was interested in > it), or was there not enough time? It's kind of hard to tell really --- there are many patches in our queue and not nearly enough reviewers. So maybe someone will get to it in the fullness of time, or maybe it's true that no one cares about the particular topic. (But bug fixes and performance improvements are almost always interesting to someone.) I recommend optimism: as long as *you* still believe that the patch is worthwhile, keep pushing it forward to the next commitfest. We used to do that automatically, but we have started asking authors to do that themselves, as a way of weeding out patches for which the author has lost interest. regards, tom lane