Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rl86r-000GAS-62 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:00:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rl86o-009ITX-Ja for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:00:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rl86o-009ITA-AG for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:00:30 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rl86k-004ecl-P1 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:00:29 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 42FE0M6R2498596; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:00:22 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Heikki Linnakangas cc: Michael Paquier , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: Weird test mixup In-reply-to: <8e4cf596-dd70-432e-9068-16466ed596ed@iki.fi> References: <10fd6cdd-c5d9-46fe-9fa1-7e661191309e@iki.fi> <2387221.1710454778@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2393552.1710458033@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44f5bf13-b46e-4b87-84de-2ac70fddbda0@iki.fi> <8e4cf596-dd70-432e-9068-16466ed596ed@iki.fi> Comments: In-reply-to Heikki Linnakangas message dated "Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:10:14 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2498594.1710511222.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:00:22 -0400 Message-ID: <2498595.1710511222@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Heikki Linnakangas writes: > On 15/03/2024 13:09, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> I committed a patch to do that, to put out the fire. > That's turning the buildfarm quite red. Many, but not all animals are > failing like this: It may be even worse than it appears from the buildfarm status page. My animals were stuck in infinite loops that required a manual "kill" to get out of, and it's reasonable to assume there are others that will require owner intervention. Why would this test have done that, if the module failed to load? regards, tom lane