From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
cc: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>,
        pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, exclusion@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Conflict between regression tests namespace & transactions due to
 recent changes
In-reply-to: <20230516050311.GB252324@rfd.leadboat.com>
References: <80d0201636665d82185942e7112257b4@postgrespro.ru>
 <2165312.1684167368@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20230516050311.GB252324@rfd.leadboat.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
	message dated "Mon, 15 May 2023 22:03:11 -0700"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2527107.1684214347.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 01:19:07 -0400
Message-ID: <2527108.1684214347@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2527108.1684214347%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> For the record, I'm fairly sure s/public, test_ns_schema_1/test_ns_schema_1/
> on the new namespace tests would also solve things.  Those tests don't need
> "public" in the picture.  Nonetheless, +1 for your proposal.

Hmm, I'd not read the test case all that closely, but I did think
that including "public" in the search path was an important part
of it.  If it is not, maybe the comments could use adjustment.

			regards, tom lane