Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJIRF-0007l9-Mq for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 17:13:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJIRE-0006zH-EV for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 17:13:28 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJIRE-0006z8-5G for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 17:13:28 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJIRC-0000OM-1y for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 17:13:27 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 21DHDHvl2597661; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 12:13:17 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: Andres Freund , Justin Pryzby , Alvaro Herrera , Andrew Dunstan , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , Thomas Munro , Melanie Plageman , Peter Eisentraut , Daniel Gustafsson Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree In-reply-to: References: <20220117192510.txue5mihjaxlngep@alap3.anarazel.de> <85428.1642447853@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20220117201619.3ltudwhgk2krmoki@alap3.anarazel.de> <20220118210847.GC23027@telsasoft.com> <20220203035827.GG23027@telsasoft.com> <20220203195718.smqo5xg4ygp5qktq@alap3.anarazel.de> <20220204050403.GL23027@telsasoft.com> <20220213012008.4wpqzyszxu3z22d2@alap3.anarazel.de> <20220213051937.GO31460@telsasoft.com> <20220213083006.f2wulffsxr5zfwc4@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Sun, 13 Feb 2022 11:39:33 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2597659.1644772397.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 12:13:17 -0500 Message-ID: <2597660.1644772397@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Robert Haas writes: > This is exactly why I'm not a huge fan of having ci stuff in the tree. > It supposes that there's one right way to do a build, but in reality, > different people want and indeed need to use different options for all > kinds of reasons. That's the whole value of having things like > configure and pg_config_manual.h. When we start arguing about whether > or ci builds should use -DWRITE_READ_PARSE_PLAN_TREES we're inevitably > into the realm where no choice is objectively better, Right. Can we set things up so that it's not too painful to inject custom build options into a CI build? I should think that at the very least one needs to be able to vary the configure switches and CPPFLAGS/CFLAGS. regards, tom lane