From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
        Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
        Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>,
        Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
        PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: make installcheck-world in a clean environment
In-reply-to: <20fd7da2-cc15-b538-d3b9-896aad695d23@gmail.com>
References: <24834.1525712835@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20180912072049.GL25160@paquier.xyz>
 <171724bb-0436-3665-6738-cbd42bdf9783@gmail.com>
 <8351.1542331145@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <6f7a6818-78d8-48ee-1a0f-e4ad30615af3@gmail.com>
 <CA+q6zcWE_tWhwZibGU+1ktDjHZR__Bxe5a+aybqwr9ummkAbBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <502e87c5-da7d-fc75-6597-94dffc387fd9@gmail.com>
 <dabc52ea-14b6-3109-26b1-e83a9dc62cc0@gmail.com>
 <20190204021103.GR1881@paquier.xyz>
 <20190214194029.kggud627dmi67gou@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <20190218040743.GK15532@paquier.xyz>
 <44c101dc-f763-f47f-1ac1-6a0709455033@pgmasters.net>
 <2a4cf0d7-dd67-560a-ac62-cbc127662e95@gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGLTYCDStwrLuH0O-CeVqEQJ=otzia2EVfScXtatOxUzxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20fd7da2-cc15-b538-d3b9-896aad695d23@gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
	message dated "Fri, 05 Jul 2019 15:41:08 +0300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <26013.1564505808.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:56:48 -0400
Message-ID: <26014.1564505808@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> writes:
> 01.07.2019 13:47, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> A new CF is here and this is in "Needs Review".  Would you like to
>> provide a rebased patch, or should it really be withdrawn?

> The rebased patch is attached, but I still can't find anyone interested
> in reviewing it.
> So let's withdraw it.

I agree with withdrawing this, and have marked it that way in the CF app.

I think the fundamental problem here is that nobody except Alexander
is unhappy with the current behavior of "make installcheck", and it
is not very clear whether this patch might change the behavior in
ways that do make others unhappy.  So I think it's best to set it
aside pending more people agreeing that there's a problem to solve.

			regards, tom lane