Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebpxF-0001ja-49 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:48:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebpxE-0002Sp-Mb for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:48:44 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebpxE-0002Sf-Fk for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:48:44 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ebpxB-0001QX-TU for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:48:43 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w0HFmZRN026128; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:48:35 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Marina Polyakova cc: vitus@wagner.pp.ru, Andres Freund , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Alvaro Herrera Subject: Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10 In-reply-to: References: <0d3a9fa264cebe1cb9966f37b7c06e86@postgrespro.ru> <20180111173938.jimybeayp2u5mmup@alap3.anarazel.de> <31a342fa6a025a8bdfc5b8b19c29d56d@postgrespro.ru> <1232.1515780057@sss.pgh.pa.us> <15299.1515867055@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18209.1516059711@sss.pgh.pa.us> <90ab676392c8f9c84431976147097cf0@postgrespro.ru> <16720.1516201657@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Marina Polyakova message dated "Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:46:13 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <26126.1516204115.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:48:35 -0500 Message-ID: <26127.1516204115@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Marina Polyakova writes: > On 17-01-2018 18:07, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, I can work with this. What I propose to do is use a somewhat >> stripped-down version of this test as an AC_RUN_IFELSE test normally, >> but if cross-compiling, fall back to just seeing if we can link. > Thanks, I'll try to do this.. And Victor attached a stripped-down > version of this in [1]. Oh, I was already working on a patch, thanks. regards, tom lane