Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aobqw-0001Lq-0D for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 19:13:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aobqv-0001oG-C0 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 19:13:57 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aobqt-0001mu-IS for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 19:13:55 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aobql-0005YD-Vh; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 19:13:54 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u38JDhbh026336; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:13:43 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: Tomas Vondra , David Steele , Tatsuo Ishii , =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro_Herrera?= , Petr Jelinek , Jeff Janes , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: multivariate statistics v14 In-reply-to: References: <060fe904-7210-cc5a-65d7-02f6e8f0cb1e@2ndquadrant.com> <26597.1458941172@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20160326.181833.1902389187691662331.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp> <95089064-e388-2cd1-ab62-7c88890eaf67@2ndquadrant.com> <56FA9CA9.4030401@pgmasters.net> <5d1d62a6-6228-188c-e079-c1be59942168@2ndquadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:03:49 -0400" Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:13:43 -0400 Message-ID: <26335.1460142823@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Robert Haas writes: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Tomas Vondra > wrote: >> Well, me to. But my feeling is the patch received entirely insufficient >> amount of thorough code review, considering how important part of the code >> it touches. I agree docs are an important part of a patch, but polishing >> user-level docs would hardly move the patch closer to being committable >> (especially when there's ~50kB of READMEs). > I have to admit that I was really hoping Tom would follow through on > his statement that he would look into this one, or that Dean Rasheed > would get involved. I'm sorry I didn't get to it, but it's not like I have been slacking during this commitfest. At some point, you just have to accept that not everything we could wish will get into 9.6. I will make it a high priority for 9.7, though. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers