Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA456347FC
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:47:40 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 76160-03
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:47:37 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616876347E4
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:47:37 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n5HElWi2026371;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:47:32 -0400 (EDT)
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@pjmodos.net>
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema 
In-reply-to: <200906171744.24456.peter_e@gmx.net> 
References: <4A37BF63.50008@pjmodos.net> <200906171644.53717.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<25515.1245248104@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<200906171744.24456.peter_e@gmx.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
	message dated "Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:44:24 +0300"
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:47:32 -0400
Message-ID: <26370.1245250052@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200906/1059
X-Sequence-Number: 140114

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Why don't we tell people to write a plpgsql loop for the schema.* case as 
> well?

Indeed, why not?  This all seems much more like gilding the lily than
delivering useful new capability.  The default-ACL stuff that Stephen
is working on seems far more important in practice.

			regards, tom lane