Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ixE4n-0005F2-8Z for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:58:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ixE4m-0004ss-2h for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:58:00 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ixE4l-0004sl-MQ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:57:59 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ixE4j-0000Ji-3j for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:57:58 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 00UHvqQE026452; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:57:52 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Fujii Masao cc: Amit Langote , Fujii Masao , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: table partitioning and access privileges In-reply-to: References: <6218.1577388354@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3546b691-b744-12c9-fd2f-7dc31c3c030e@oss.nttdata.com> <21015.1580400165@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Fujii Masao message dated "Fri, 31 Jan 2020 02:45:13 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <26450.1580407072.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:57:52 -0500 Message-ID: <26451.1580407072@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Fujii Masao writes: > On 2020/01/31 1:28, Fujii Masao wrote: >> On 2020/01/31 1:02, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Sorry for not having paid closer attention to this thread, but ... >>> is back-patching this behavioral change really a good idea? > I'm thinking to wait at least half a day before reverting > the back-patch just in case someone can give opinion > during that period. Sure, other opinions welcome. We still have a week before the back-branch releases. regards, tom lane