Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pP49M-0001gn-Gn for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:15:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pP49L-0004lr-Ei for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:15:23 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pP49L-0004li-5K for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:15:23 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pP49J-0002vB-5o for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:15:22 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 316GFDNW2676425; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:15:13 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: Bharath Rupireddy , Kyotaro Horiguchi , simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com, thomas.munro@gmail.com, nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, pryzby@telsasoft.com, michael@paquier.xyz, andres@anarazel.de, sfrost@snowman.net, magnus@hagander.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays) In-reply-to: References: <20221121.112000.896907652962800511.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> <2675756.1675699635@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Mon, 06 Feb 2023 11:08:56 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2676423.1675700113.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 11:15:13 -0500 Message-ID: <2676424.1675700113@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Robert Haas writes: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 11:07 AM Tom Lane wrote: >> Umm ... is this really the sort of patch to be committing on a >> release wrap day? > Oh, shoot, I wasn't thinking about that. Would you like me to revert > it in v15 for now? Yeah, seems like the safest course. I wouldn't object to it going in after the release is over, but right now there's zero margin for error. regards, tom lane