Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pMRib-000540-Am for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:48:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pMRia-0006fx-8i for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:48:56 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pMRiZ-0006fo-UI for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:48:55 +0000 Received: from wnew4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.18]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pMRiX-0007og-31 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:48:55 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11CF2B0698A; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 05:48:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 05:48:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1675075727; x= 1675082927; bh=FuxP8g96Zig1JYtMfbuvI+gwgoOtlqsr0HrxWtfd8AQ=; b=N uic+f+7MzmasscKiWIgAw+z0gBj76rJ1tp5KEl3pDrXEcijtWrFV3z4obQP1HWwZ C8uIcyDgkHwZ6SSdKLFnoqghqYqEL/WucoE9Dq4wJaca2PHplvV2RPUvXJw/qwo5 UaeiKrBoHHQH8u6S6dsF2R287FXfV4Cp4/8hO4H56vi1CPLK3XYSMJpLVT6qxC5k JzXdLr4cOPiGk5nD7pcK+ntqRKQ5Kmnw/kKC/iRePy3x6MY3Q9y8BcZ14/uJZ0GF rekLPeFLfoF3LhGLl1KSBMnrMX0Zur8Wd8JpSvphkXolaMFdj4x7BjLEEQVhR347 y4PZ0e4NOZEB66KiFJang== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudefvddgvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvght vghrucfgihhsvghnthhrrghuthcuoehpvghtvghrrdgvihhsvghnthhrrghuthesvghnth gvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehleffgeegudejteei hfelteduvdeifffhffdvjedvffegjeekudeludehudeifeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpvghtvghrrdgvihhsvghnthhrrghu thesvghnthgvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i131946ab:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 05:48:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <268fd337-8bb7-92e6-0da2-416c022c11f3@enterprisedb.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:48:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl Content-Language: en-US To: Michael Paquier Cc: Postgres hackers , "Drouvot, Bertrand" References: <50b571dc-e0c0-22be-9803-4a3480d2e792@enterprisedb.com> <9695f035-0f2b-92b9-deed-0b7e5bb7e4e0@enterprisedb.com> From: Peter Eisentraut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 27.01.23 03:59, Michael Paquier wrote: > At the end, that would be unnoticeable for the average user, I guess, > but here are the numbers I get on my laptop :) Personally, I think we do not want the two jumble methods in parallel. Maybe there are other opinions. I'm going to set this thread as "Ready for Committer". Either wait a bit for more feedback on this topic, or just go ahead with either solution. We can leave it as a semi-open item for reconsideration later.