Message-ID: <271f899c54d112b353e009286af7c6cdb7c3d609.camel@j-davis.com>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --with-* options
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, Nathan Bossart
	 <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, pgsql-hackers
	 <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:58:04 -0700
In-Reply-To: <1854ffbf-f8eb-4bc3-b9f8-223bbf58c392@oss.nttdata.com>
References: <7cc52488-f876-4ad3-affd-6e4b0ef0cb09@eisentraut.org>
	 <aEMLzPQtjRbj2R7X@nathan>
	 <CA+TgmoactJEUHeXuxHLKNXHzm6-XrQFigPur-4nHTMFSiSRkiQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <aErpuM6RXSlK1FBW@nathan>
	 <1854ffbf-f8eb-4bc3-b9f8-223bbf58c392@oss.nttdata.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.3-0ubuntu1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/271f899c54d112b353e009286af7c6cdb7c3d609.camel%40j-davis.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2025-06-13 at 09:39 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:

> By the way, if we keep --with-statistics in pg_dump, are we planning
> to
> continue using the --with-xxx naming pattern for new options that
> specify extra data to dump?

Good point. Now that we are getting rid of some of the other options,
we don't need to worry about consistency with them, and I think we
should just use "--statistics".

Regards,
	Jeff Davis