Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jP7vV-00079t-Ud for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:03:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jP7vU-0004ZW-0o for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:03:44 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jP7vT-0004YD-Qe for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:03:43 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jP7vQ-0007yf-Nr for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:03:42 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03GH3aEH027620; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:03:36 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Pierre Giraud cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? In-reply-to: <9991f78c-989e-9089-12ee-6b8d2904929f@dalibo.com> References: <8691.1586798003@sss.pgh.pa.us> <30753.1586971147@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29261.1586989134@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20662.1587048193@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9991f78c-989e-9089-12ee-6b8d2904929f@dalibo.com> Comments: In-reply-to Pierre Giraud message dated "Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:12:28 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <27618.1587056616.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:03:36 -0400 Message-ID: <27619.1587056616@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Pierre Giraud writes: > Le 16/04/2020 à 16:43, Tom Lane a écrit : >> Pierre Giraud writes: >>> The screenshot attached uses a
tag for the descrition/example block. >> That looks about right, perhaps, but could you be a little clearer about >> how you accomplished that? > Attached you will find the HTML structure with associated styles. > Sorry I haven't tried to do this from the DocBook sources. > I hope this helps though. After a bit of poking at it, I couldn't find another way to do that than using a structure. Which is an annoying amount of markup to be adding to each table cell, but I guess we could live with it. A bigger problem is that docbook applies styles to the
structure that, at least by default, add a LOT of vertical space. Doesn't seem real workable unless we can undo that. regards, tom lane