Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO8oj-0003WZ-Tx for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 23:48:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO8oi-0006rr-G5 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 23:48:40 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO8oi-0006rj-9F for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 23:48:40 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO8of-0001NX-Rk for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 23:48:39 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03DNmZuo002766; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 19:48:35 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "David G. Johnston" cc: Isaac Morland , PostgreSQL Developers Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? In-reply-to: <31833.1586817876@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <8691.1586798003@sss.pgh.pa.us> <12135.1586802423@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18168.1586810511@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18929.1586811439@sss.pgh.pa.us> <31833.1586817876@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:44:36 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2756.1586821715.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 19:48:35 -0400 Message-ID: <2765.1586821715@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > I don't think I like the
version better than
--- it adds > quite a bit of vertical space, more than I was expecting really. Actually, after staring more at HTML-hr.png, what's *really* bothering me about that rendering is that the lines made by
are actually wider than the inter-table-cell lines. Surely we want the opposite relationship. Presumably that could be fixed with some css-level adjustments; and maybe the spacing could be tightened up a bit too? I do like having that visual separation, it just needs to be toned down compared to the table cell separators. Reproducing the effect in the PDF build remains an issue, too. regards, tom lane