Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyQSx-0004JK-Kr for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 20:01:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyQSw-0006ml-UG for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 20:01:14 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyQSv-0006kf-2B; Fri, 29 May 2015 20:01:13 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YyQSr-0003i7-T4; Fri, 29 May 2015 20:01:12 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4TK10jB027698; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:01:00 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Stephen Frost cc: Bruce Momjian , Magnus Hagander , Robert Haas , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , pgsql-core Subject: Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release In-reply-to: <20150529195751.GN26667@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <20150529185431.GG26667@tamriel.snowman.net> <26984.1432927977@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20150529195609.GD16602@momjian.us> <20150529195751.GN26667@tamriel.snowman.net> Comments: In-reply-to Stephen Frost message dated "Fri, 29 May 2015 15:57:51 -0400" Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:01:00 -0400 Message-ID: <27697.1432929660@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Stephen Frost writes: > * Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote: >> I am unclear if we are anywhere near ready for beta1 even in June. Are >> we? > I'm all about having that discussion... but can we do it on another > thread or at least wait til we've decided about the back-branch > releases? They are clearly the more important issue to consider. It's the same discussion though, ie what releases are we expecting to get out in the next couple of weeks. It's possible that we ought to give up on a pre-conference beta. Certainly a whole lot of time that I'd hoped would go into reviewing 9.5 feature commits has instead gone into back-branch bug chasing this week. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers