public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Simon Riggs <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Parameter for planner estimate of recursive queries
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:25:36 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANbhV-FGxKuPNo2QPnzVnb=S=u4zq7DvmxV7LaAvtSTxVn5kFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANbhV-EuaLm4H3g0+BSTYHEGxJj3Kht0R+rJ8vT57Dejnh=_nA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANbhV-HGhrkoF9BoHXScVZY8_HnBoHzGRQU15E6iPaF6ij0Cmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CA+TgmoaGDw2baysiK+qqL+c3roa-9cPSvJ_Kwdgx7RoPQR0TaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CANbhV-FL=MHtofMnv2PhSoUxdSyzooG1HrvaD7RUzrhMA0dj7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANbhV-FGxKuPNo2QPnzVnb=S=u4zq7DvmxV7LaAvtSTxVn5kFQ@mail.gmail.com>

Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes:
>> [New patch version pending]

Do you have any objection if I rename the GUC to
recursive_worktable_factor?  That seems a bit clearer as to what
it does, and it leaves more room for other knobs in the same area
if we decide we need any.

			regards, tom lane

view thread (16+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Parameter for planner estimate of recursive queries
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox