From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
        Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
        Fujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org>,
        Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
In-reply-to: <20231017164517.GA613565@nathanxps13>
References: <20230226201227.cner3cdicropu4q5@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <20230301043603.GD1453450@nathanxps13> <20230301224751.GA1823946@nathanxps13>
 <20231010234028.iba6wotmp22poxoh@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <20231011025418.GA845134@nathanxps13> <20231011032934.GA847236@nathanxps13>
 <20231011033929.j7doct7wzmyw6xiu@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <ZSYeRi9isT7rzZ_a@paquier.xyz> <20231011190000.GA894647@nathanxps13>
 <20231017154647.GA611717@nathanxps13> <20231017164517.GA613565@nathanxps13>
Comments: In-reply-to Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
	message dated "Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:45:17 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2820644.1697561249.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:47:29 -0400
Message-ID: <2820645.1697561249@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2820645.1697561249%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> ... and it looks like some of the back-branches are failing for Windows.
> I'm assuming this is because c290e79 was only back-patched to v15.  My
> first instinct is just to back-patch that one all the way to v11, but maybe
> there's an alternative involving #ifdef WIN32.  Are there any concerns with
> back-patching c290e79?

Sounds fine to me.

			regards, tom lane