Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czUyT-0001KJ-OG for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 21:11:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czUyT-0004Fy-9x for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 21:11:17 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czUwy-0001Yp-FB for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 21:09:44 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czUwv-00022G-Ma for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 21:09:44 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v3FL9cT7002830; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:09:38 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken In-reply-to: <20170415210643.cdapwhwmbiwaqd6e@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <7036.1492231361@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18D5D7AF-C587-4B63-B2CF-13590849A624@anarazel.de> <32559.1492278226@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1842.1492289285@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20170415210643.cdapwhwmbiwaqd6e@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:06:43 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2828.1492290578.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:09:38 -0400 Message-ID: <2829.1492290578@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Andres Freund writes: > That seems quite reasonable. I'm afraid we're going to have to figure > out something similar, but more robust, for windows soon-ish :/ Why doesn't Windows' ability to map the segment into the new process before it executes take care of that? > As a minor point, it'd probably be good to add addr=%zu, requestedAddress > or such. Yeah, I'd come to the same conclusion right after sending that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers