Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gvlch-0002NH-Nt for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:18:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gvlcg-0002gB-CU for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:18:26 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gvlcg-0002fd-5X for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:18:26 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gvlcd-0005LA-TB for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:18:25 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1IGIJ6w028361; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:18:19 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Peter Eisentraut , Daniel Gustafsson , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress In-reply-to: <20190218143028.GA3700@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20190218143028.GA3700@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:30:28 -0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <28359.1550506699.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:18:19 -0500 Message-ID: <28360.1550506699@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > On 2019-Feb-18, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> We should also strive to align "FAILED" properly. >> Yeah, not strictly required, but someone might want to play around with >> it a bit. > FWIW I don't think we localize pg_regress output currently, so that > argument seems moot ... But I think we can get away with constant four > spaces for now. I pushed Peter's suggestion for %8.0f; let's live with that for a little and see if it's still annoying. regards, tom lane