Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bdKHa-0003Dm-8T for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:47:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bdKHZ-0004t4-QA for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:47:05 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bdKGC-0003MR-A1 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:45:40 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bdKFu-0000r3-OL for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:45:39 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u7QGipE6028991; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:44:51 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Heikki Linnakangas , Andreas Karlsson , Victor Wagner , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Christoph Berg Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more In-reply-to: <0202d5cd-bd0f-9084-70ec-649a40d0cba9@2ndquadrant.com> References: <20160627151604.GD1051@msg.df7cb.de> <1805.1467041061@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8a0a5959-0b83-3dc8-d9e7-66ce8c1c5bc7@proxel.se> <688a438c-ccc2-0431-7100-26e418fc3bca@proxel.se> <20160705121347.5c5c702f@fafnir.local.vm> <34821a62-ac89-ffb2-7516-7a8b15c04723@proxel.se> <7ff5558f-cff5-3768-2fb3-6b50b58294e5@iki.fi> <0202d5cd-bd0f-9084-70ec-649a40d0cba9@2ndquadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:36:30 -0400" Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:44:51 -0400 Message-ID: <28990.1472229891@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Peter Eisentraut writes: > On 8/26/16 5:31 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> I think now would be a good time to drop support for OpenSSL versions >> older than 0.9.8. OpenSSL don't even support 0.9.8 anymore, although >> there are probably distributions out there that still provide patches >> for it. But OpenSSL 0.9.7 and older are really not interesting for >> PostgreSQL 10 anymore, I think. > CentOS 5 currently ships 0.9.8e. That's usually the oldest OS we want > to support eagerly. Also, I get this on fully-up-to-date OS X (El Capitan): $ openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.8zh 14 Jan 2016 Worth noting though is that without -Wno-deprecated-declarations, you find that Apple has sprinkled the entire OpenSSL API with deprecation warnings. That suggests that their plan for the future is to drop it rather than update it. Should we be thinking ahead to that? regards, tom lane PS: I still have 0.9.7 on some of my buildfarm critters. But I could either update them, or stop using --with-openssl there. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers